Starbucks, Why Do You Hate Animals and the Planet?

UN LAB Middleware Label: Title Ends

First things first: Milk stolen from cows is a product of sexual violence, it effs up the environment, and it’s bad for your health. We aren’t falling for it like others did—we know the truth behind generations of cringe “Got Milk?” ads and realize that normalizing human consumption of dairy (when so many Black people and other people of color are lactose intolerant) is not OK.

So, why would a company like Starbucks that claims to care about the environment (which, uh, animals are a part of!), racial equality, and its customers literally punish people for choosing nondairy milks like oat, almond, soy, or coconut? It’s alllll about money: Starbucks charges up to 80 cents more for them.

This needs to end.

No one should be charged more for making a compassionate and environmentally friendly choice, and what about people who can’t even tolerate cow’s milk (which makes sense, considering that we aren’t baby cows 🙄)? The dairy industry is one of the cruelest—female animals are sexually abused, their babies are stolen from them, and they’re killed when they’re no longer “productive.” Tbh, anyone choosing nondairy milk should be rewarded, not penalized.

Tell Starbucks to drop the extra charge for nondairy milks!

Jones II
Public Affairs for Starbucks

Take Action Now!

Fields with an asterisk(*) are required. 

Giving us your date of birth helps us to make sure we send you the most relevant actions to help animals!

Get texts & occasional phone calls for Action Alerts, local events, & other updates to help animals with peta2! (optional)

Sign me up for the following e-mail: